Uncategorized

ARC Review: Jane Seymour

(click to pre-order!)

I’m going to begin by saying that I was kind of dreading this one given that I absolutely loathed the one about Anne Boleyn. I suppose I’m biased, given how much I like Anne. I feel as though history paints her as “the whore” but we need to remember that Henry was the king. Women back then didn’t get much of a say in how things went. But let us not dwell on semantics. I could get legnthy.

Regardless, here we go!

I actually came away liking Jane a bit more after having read this. Weir brings us an imagined version of Jane as to why she didn’t marry earlier–she wanted to be a nun. Whilst we have no way in knowing why in reality Jane didn’t marry earlier, it was an interesting take upon it. One wonders if that is the truth or if she really was plain and had trouble finding someone willing. Her family wasn’t in the poorhouse, so it would seem peculiar that a woman of good stock and was of marrying age wasn’t married. Not to mention her younger sister married before her.

The book, of course, introduces us to the entire Seymour clan and brings us to Wulfhall (Wolf Hall for Hilary Mantel fans) leading us though Jane’s life, the history of the family, their joys and sorrows..it’s a lively take on the family life and it’s interesting to see how things worked then.

Once Jane gets to court, first serving Katherine of Aragon, then Anne Boleyn, we get a good viewing of what life was like back then. I was amused by Jane’s naivety sometimes but was also irritated in some moments. I also found Sir Francis Bryan trying to woo her as a bit odd. But, that was court life. A young, unattached woman with access to the Queen? Always a draw for this hoping to reach high levels.

It was interesting to get an idea of how Jane may have felt about the swiftness of her courtship with the King and how fast Anne had her downfall. There are moments where Jane really pondered her part in the whole thing and it was easy to feel sympathy for her. At least I did.

We, of course, know what happens to Jane, so I won’t bore you with that. But I think you’ll be surprised that you will see more to ‘Plain Jane’ than you thought.

This book has made Jane rise like her personal device, a phoenix. We often dismiss her for being plain and otherwise useless but I think Jane Seymour is quite admirable, given how she risked her neck for trying to save the monestaries, people in the tower as well as trying to reconcile Henry and the Lady Mary.

Sometimes, it’s the quiet ones who really surprise us all.

Additional Notes:

  • Iā€™d give it ā˜…ā˜…ā˜… stars.
  • I was provided a copy from NetGalley in exchange for my honest review. šŸ˜€
  • I would recommend this to a friend! (I know, surprising!)
Uncategorized

Katherine of Aragon: The True Queen [Review]

It’s pretty obvious to anyone who knows 51mecqcnxnlme that I love all things Tudor. I find the history fascinating and I love reading about the people who made that history interesting. Alison Weir is a favorite of mine; I tend to enjoy her novels. In fact, her novel, ‘Innocent Traitor’, which is about Lady Jane Grey, is actually one of my favorites. When I found out she was writing a series about Henry VIII’s wives, I was excited.

Her first about Catherine of Aragon was beautifully written and it offered a portrait into Henry’s longest lasting wife and to the woman herself. It was nice to see Catherine portrayed as a young, vibrant woman; one plagued with worries and fears, one who had extreme poise and grace and who was genuinely a good woman who was eventually treated extremely poorly by her husband and also by her father-in-law, who used her a bargaining chip.

catherine-of-aragon-maria-doyle-kennedy-as-catherine-of-aragon-24909784-501-626
Maria Doyle Kennedy as Queen Catherine in ‘The Tudors’.

To say that there were raw emotions exposed in this novel would be an understatement.

 

From start to finish, it was a roller coaster, highs and lows of Queen Catherine of Aragon’s life. We see her go from Infanta of Spain to Princess of Wales to Queen of England. (And eventually the dowager Princess of Wales, but this was not a title she accepted.) Her life was never dull and I walked away feeling like I knew her a little better and that I understood her far better than I ever had before. Ms. Weir wrote of the intrigues of court, the political landscape and of the woman herself with dignity and honor.

It was also nice to see her portrayed as she looked–not as the middle aged, dark haired Spaniard that TV is overly fond of portraying her as. Catherine is often made out to be a stubborn, bitter woman (not that she wouldn’t have reason to be) and it’s a huge insult to the woman herself. Henry thought her capable enough to be left as Regent of England when he was away fighting in France. Not only did she end up riding in full armor (whilst pregnant!) to deliver a speech when the Scots rebelled, she sent Henry the Scottish King, James IV’s bloody jacket to use as his banner. Catherine was no shrinking violet and I found myself weeping for her when she was subjected to Henry’s cruelty–especially when he kept her from their daughter, Mary. This proud daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella deserved much better than what she got in the end.

Now, I do think there were moments where Ms. Weir floundered, namely where she tried to write Catherine as being sort of oblivious to Mary Boleyn or Bessie Blount, Henry’s mistresses. In fact, she only became aware of Bessie after she bore Henry a son. That doesn’t strike me as correct; I tend to think that she probably knew and perhaps she wasn’t very vocal about it, but I don’t believe that she didn’t know. It is something many kings did; kept a mistress as he had to ‘seek his pleasure’ when she was with child. Something that Catherine was very capable of doing; even if she then miscarried or had a stillbirth.

I also found that there are moments where it sounds like Ms. Weir just copy and pasted a direct quote from the subjects into the story; I can understand it for letters, but in speech, it sounded strange; it didn’t sound right with the tone of the story, if that makes sense. It would have sounded better if paraphrased in the tone of the Catherine of the book’s voice.

One last note–16 year old Catherine being attracted to 10 year old Henry. That was sort of creepy.

My Rating:Ā ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…Ā½